Gospel of John #20
Some heated remarks — and debates – take place concerning biblical literalism or inerrancy. Here’s a quick idea to provoke insight and debate.
In my view, the theology of the cross from the New Testament actually disrupts biblical inerrancy. For instance, in the Gospel of John, Jesus’s miracles and teachings are life-giving, while the opposition to them is fueled by a kind of biblical literalism and deadening religious orthodoxy.
(On this: see John 7 , especially 7:24: “Do not judge by appearances, but judge with right judgment.” To judge by appearances is to judge according to mechanistic adaptations of the law of Moses and scriptures).
The anti-Jewish tendencies of the scripture should be repudiated, in turn — lest we ourselves lapse into a fanaticism based on the letter of the text. The Jews, in the Gospel of John, are the bad-guys, caricatured to display what not to do–(even though Jesus himself was Jewish). The Jesus movement in its early days constituted a branch or sect of Judaism. The disciples of Jesus were both Jews and Gentiles — not yet “Christians,” nor was their religion one that supplanted its own Jewish ancestry.
The theological message remains vital. The life-giving presence of God –through miracles, teachings, etc. – disrupts religious structures that are based on conformity to doctrine or to the letter of the law. Extreme biblical literalism collapses if we soak in this presence of the Christ.